An Awful Truth: Mike Flanagan’s “Absentia”

Absentia, a horror film from director Mike Flanagan, opens on a pregnant woman walking the streets of a serene suburban neighborhood. This is Tricia, and we watch as she pulls down tattered flyers from telephone poles only to replace them with fresh copies. These are missing person posters, and they bear the likeness of her absent husband. Daniel vanished seven years ago, without a note or an argument or the least signs of struggle. Now, however reluctantly, his wife is ready to declare him legally dead. AbsentiaFestivalPosterThe question of his fate still bothers her, and Flanagan gives us a few, rapid-fire fantasies in which Tricia imagines what may have happened to her husband, but she has mostly come to terms with this mystery. Her little sister, on the run from some demons of her own, arrives to help Tricia pack the man’s things. In these quiet streets, though, the sisters will discover an answer of sorts to the riddle of Daniel’s disappearance. Despite their desire to know why this kind man would have just walked out on his life one evening, they will find that there are some questions better left unanswered.

The vocabulary of grief is chiefly one of loss. This observation is all but a tautology, but it bears paying some attention to. Whether they are taken by death or vanish from our lives due to relational or geographic alienation, we lose our loved ones. How much more terrible is this absence when we are left with no answers, no knowledge of where they have gone, not to mention why they were lost to us? “I just want to know,” say lovers and friends and family members of the missing, “I just want to know what happened to her, to him.” Anything, we hear, would be better than never knowing where they went, if they are out there still or not, if they suffered. absentia2011720pbrripx2While most horror movies focus on the suffering of characters or the events which lead to pain and death, most do not devote much time to the emotional wreckage left behind. And if they deal with this lack of crucial knowledge, it is usually only in order that the full revelation of the loved one’s fate will carry more weight.  In Absentia, this enigma forms the very center of a story about love, loss, and unfathomable horror. It is to the filmmakers’ credit that they recognize that such a story must be composed of as many parts grief as it is of terror.

Absentia is a fine example, perhaps one of the best in decades, of what has been labeled quiet horror. This is a tradition which has seen far more success in horror literature than in cinema as it relies on moods, ideas, and implication, all difficult to catch on the screen if not actually “unfilmable.” This movie does an incredible job of communicating the spiritual unease in which Daniel’s family has been left, a malaise which is, in the opening sequences, more bittersweet than terrifying. When this disquiet breaks through into the film, it initially does so in quick, hard to parse moments. Nightmares, hallucinations, eerie encounters: what Tricia and her sister Callie initially experience may be a psychological response to their need to say goodbye without having any real answers. They, certainly, think so, at least at first… They will find, though, that this neighborhood hides secrets darker than those a sudden disappearance typically calls to mind.absentia2 Absentia draws its audience into its mysteries with subtlety and a grace not often associated with horror film. An early shot, in which Callie jogs through the neighborhood, into a dark underpass, and out to a view of the city, establishes a beautiful note on which the rest of the film will elaborate. Twisted truths lurk just beneath the mundane world: this is the promise of much quiet horror, and the technique is one of a most careful, almost glancing delineation of these disturbing realities.

Though there are a few moments of violence, these are quick and oblique. Rather than depend on extended torture sequences and explicit gore, which are perfectly acceptable devices in other sorts of horror narratives, Absentia relies on flashes of the bizarre and a carefully enunciated mood. Slowly but so effectively, Tricia’s house and the street on which it sits are invested with an ambiance of sad dread. One of the film’s many excellences is the way in which it sustains this emotional dimension while slowly broadening the scope of the piece. This is aided by the strong performances of the film’s two leads, Courtney Bell and Katie Parker, both of whom bring naturalistic, understated responses to such a strange situation. Absentia is an odd horror movie, in that an unwary viewer who watches only every other scene would be justified in considering it a powerful, yet realistic, “dramedy” about characters learning to deal with the loss of a loved one. This makes their plight, when they finally get a clear sight of its scope, all the more devastating.

This attention to psychological details is one way in which the film builds an environment of subdued dread. Another way in which it does so is in its slow, deliberate parceling out of its revelations. While one character, toward the end, tries to put the pieces of this puzzle together, Flanagan is wise to leave this solution cursory at best, an updated fairy tale with the most awful questions unanswered. In this, Absentia resembles the best stories of Ramsey Campbell and Robert Aickman, two authors who excel in crafting uneasy mysteries and delightfully ambiguous resolutions. The movies to which it is most closely related must include Nicolas Roeg’s Don’t Look Now and George Sluizer’s Dutch masterpiece The Vanishing. 936full-don't-look-now-posterThese films both dealt with the sudden loss of a beloved, as well as the maddening uncertainty which often follows such devastation.  Absentia does not leave its audience frustrated: we are given an answer as to Daniel’s disappearance. The film does not, however, fully outline its horrors, leaving most of the details to our own imagination. It gives us just enough information to make us glad we do not have more. That, or, for connoisseurs of terror, enough to make us wish we had so much more. And speaking of devastating: Absentia springs at least two “twists” which I, for one, never saw coming. Far from arbitrary or contrived, these sudden turns in the plot make perfect sense, particularly in retrospect. This movie earns its surprises. They do not only add the luster of shock to the experience, they lend a strangely “realistic” sense to an increasingly weird situation. Tragedy, despite the shape we eventually give to it, usually springs on us in this way: without foreshadowing, without warning.

What gives these narrative strategies an added layer of significance in Absentia is the way in which they reflect the subject. Horror stories often give a rather full account of the nightmares with which they are concerned. They use familiar monsters from folklore, give serial killers warped backstories meant to explain their deviations, and outline the supernatural origins of monsters, or at least the “rules” which they follow. In general, they give audiences the comforting sense that while the darkness may not always be fought successfully, it can at least be understood. Even their twists usually serve the purpose of making more intelligible what has seemed opaque until then. The killer is revealed to be the one person you never suspected, the hero was a ghost all along, etcetera. absentia3Real terrors, however, rarely yield such satisfactory answers. As we are reminded almost daily, the world is filled with hideous tragedies we may never fully comprehend. The adjective “senseless” is regularly applied to such situations, but how often is this an evasion on our parts? The thought that some nightmares are simply beyond our ken may simply be more tolerable than the notion that there are answers, but they slip the nets of our understanding. Capturing this sense, that an ultimate explanation may be possible but just out of reach, is notoriously hard for artists (though they stand a better chance of communicating such an idea, arguably, than do scientists and others restricted to the use of reason). Absentia not only conveys this horror of the unknown (and of unknowing), it does so in ways perfectly in line with its theme.

Tricia and Callie hazard plenty of guesses as to what has happened to Daniel, as does Detective Mallory (who has gone from investigating this case to getting rather close to one of its principals) and other policemen. One of them may even get close to what has really happened. The awful truth, though, lies beyond anything but direct experience (a lesson also brought across in The Vanishing). Absentia drops hints, here and there, and even gestures toward an underlying logic to the situation, but in the end reason recedes before the darkness. For all too many people who have lost their loved ones to a sudden disappearance, there will never be an acceptable answer.

Absentia deserves praise for its skillful development of tension, its luminous, yet eerie direction, and the unique nightmare it unfolds. What makes the film stick in my mind, though, and what I think will make it outlast many of its bigger-budgeted cousins, is the emotional truth at its core. Our beloved lost do not usually just vanish, fade with time and healing: they reside in some dark place within us. AbsentiaStill1Making peace with their absence may be up to us, but such closure does not always accompany whatever answers we may uncover. To quote the book of Ecclesiastes, “with much knowledge comes much sorrow.” I resist the thesis (argued by plenty of authors I admire) that horror is necessarily recuperative or reassuring in nature, that its essence lies in summoning fears and then banishing them. Absentia banishes few, if any, of its shadows. Its outlining of grief, though, and the manner in which it symbolizes our experience of the lost, speaks more truth than many consoling narratives ever accomplish. That we can also experience Absentia as a finely wrought piece of entertainment is a testimony to the potentials of the genre and, more particularly, to the talents of these gifted filmmakers.

23 replies to “An Awful Truth: Mike Flanagan’s “Absentia”

  1. Nothing makes me enjoy a horror movie more than the atmosphere. Absentia established a great mood, and kept me occupied the whole way through.

  2. Thank you for this. We just watched it and were mesmerized. I have never seen a bathroom (except for Psycho), look so creepy. You are right, don’t take anything for granted


  4. Quite honestly this wasn’t a bad film for a horror scifi flick. But it really only raised other questions for me. For instance who was Tricia pregnant by? If her husband has been missing for seven years he’s certainly not the father because pregnancy only lasts nine months. So who is the babies father? It’s not the police officer that is trying to date Tricia because it would seem awfully strange for them to act so nervous on a first date if they’ve already gone so far as to sleep with each other. I also find it a bit strange that if her missing husband isn’t the father of her unborn child and neither is the detective then she must not be to overly concerned about her missing husband if she’s pregnant by some random guy. I really am at a loss on the pregnancy concept. And then the ending just blows up the whole movie both the sisters go missing to. I also hate how naive they make the characters out to be or rather ignorant.

  5. I think it was the Detective’s kid actually. When she tried to break up with him in the car, she told him he could be involved in the child’s life. It would be odd to say that to someone that you just started dating if he was not the father.

  6. Amazingly terrific! This movie took me on a fascinating journey with brilliant acting and awesome story line. What amazed me the most was how much was accomplished with what was used to make film. I go forward inspired!

  7. I normally don’t care for scary movies but this one will keep you interested in the plot of why or where they the people went too and why.

  8. This movie gave me – not nightmares exactly, but strange, resonant dreams of my own.

  9. Pingback: Absentia (2011) | Darkness Dwells

  10. This was the worst horror film I have ever seen! The actors who played the detectives were horrible. I’ve seen better acting in a porno movie. A huge waste of time,

  11. This movie was excellent. Which is ridiculously rare for horror movies, for some reason. Ominously terrifying and not a speck of gratuitous gore. Great review, too. Thanks for actually reviewing it, and not fully summarizing it. Which is also rare, and mysteriously so.

  12. I love how you didn’t get a clear visual on the “monster”, and it was left to our imagination with a hint of eerie insect-like claw tips and shadows. Quiet definitely did it for me, because the screeching was mild enough to hear the morgue-like soundtrack. I remained concerned throughout the entire film. They brought a great reality to the “Billy goats gruff” tail, and I really felt like that situation could happen-even while knowing there are no supernatural creatures waiting in tunnels… or are there?

  13. Great commentary. LOVE this movie in every way including the eerie soundtrack. It’s been a long time since I’ve seen a cover for “Don’t Look Now”. That was one creepy movie and I see the similarity with “Absentia”. More please!

  14. Blah, that’s all I can say about “absentia”, regardless of how eloquently you, the author, have written about it. It’s a snooze-fest. No suspense, the story just drags on and on,.….interesting premise, much of emotion, but this doesn’t make it a horror film, this makes it a drama film. Any scifi horror even mystery potential the director and the writer could’ve pulled from the story, was lost to a misguided point-of-view, which put me into some kind of dazed stupor. “Absentia” is neither here nor there, it’s “UNDERNEATH” .…

  15. So many people love this movie and I really tried. But it was somewhat boring and unmoving for me. The actors were not horrible and I can appreciate the effort put into it. 

    I get directors trying to be realistic but this felt like 8th grade, walking home from middle school, with nothing to do. That was about as unsettling as it got for me. Sort of that dreary, I am only 13 and have no clue about life yet but this rock is interesting.

    I actually thought that the monster was really a metaphor for the younger sister and that she was the one that was doing all of the killings while on acid trips. I further felt solidified by this when she left all of those clues for the detective sin the envelope. One might look at it in a way of her asking them to find the creature, but I look at in a way of her ocnfessing to what she did throughout the years to various people. Also, the fact that you see the younger sister at the last shot with the creature’s tentacle on her makes me think that she had a split personality and the creature exists in her mind.

  17. What made this movie exceptional,aside from the establishment of an atmosphere that made you increasingly uneasy,so much so that even the film’s scenes shot in California sunlight couldn’t banish that unease once it took hold,was the fact that unlike most horror movies,there was no cliched “final girl” happy ending.Just a lone confused and miserable male survivor who didn’t know he was a survivor,finding he was suddenly alone and without any clues as to why.Just left hoping she was alright and would come back someday.It has elements of other films like John Carpenter’s THE FOG, or THE THING,where the source of terror is almost never really seen directly but once.It’s largely left to the imagination,as in ABSENTIA,which will leave the viewer distrusting of dark and unfamiliar places,sudden dead silences,strange noises heard on the edge of sleep,and long,dim passages for days afterward.

  18. An insightful review, Mr. Flanagan, thank you.

    I just finished watching and I’m left with a few questions:

    What is the significance of the bag of keys, later found in Callie’s bed? 

    When Callie sees something cast onto the ground, she becomes scared
    and begins to run. Did she change her mind about making herself a “trade”?
    (Victim Soul)

    Does Det. Mallory believe or even read the tunnel articles Callie left for him?

  19. One more question:

    What does Daniel mean when he says to Trisha, “I know what you did.” ?

    This was in her vision, before he was found. 

    Thank you.