Comments on: The Drinkard, His Tapster, and Their Legacy ../ Your Non-Denominational Source for The Weird Thu, 10 Nov 2016 11:43:39 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.4 By: Jeffrey Cuddletrousers ../#comment-127017 Thu, 10 Nov 2016 11:43:39 +0000 ../../../../#comment-127017 @Cameron…

It’s what a critic does. They criticise.

]]> By: Cameron ../#comment-119586 Thu, 07 Jul 2016 07:11:49 +0000 ../../../../#comment-119586 I cannot believe you chose to start your review by picking on his grammatical mistakes, then saying “and yet it lives.”
Of course it lives. You run a blog called “weird fiction review.” You of all people should be able to wade through a few continuity missteps and awkward phrasings.
fuck you
you fixate on the mistakes, part of the essence of the things that make this book “weird,” “an editor’s nightmare” is a wet dream for your hackneyed website, and you choose to make a big deal about it using the word “drinkard” instead of drunkard or drunk. You do not deserve the domain name you chose for the website if you are getting tripped up by inane mundanities of weirdness.
I hate people like you, making a name for yourself by lionizing the weird, the obscure, and being simultaneously unable to process it properly. It turns into the point of view of a normal boring person on something slightly weird. I didn’t even think this book was weird, I just tried to enjoy it at face value, but people like you tokenize its weirdness and become overly sentimental about it. Fuck you

]]> By: RICHARD ../#comment-30282 Sat, 21 Jun 2014 22:20:35 +0000 ../../../../#comment-30282 I need to know the analysis of the book

]]>